Minutes:
The Chief Finance Officer presented this report. He updated the Panel on the
following.
The internal audit plan is still being progressed. With the exception of the Financials
and HR and Payroll Implementation, all are now complete. There has been some
difficulty as contractors do not have the resources either. The team are looking at
getting another agency to carry out some of the work.
The internal control board sat last week. They reviewed the timeliness of actions and
bringing internal recommendations to implementation. There was a dispute
surrounding the accounts payable audit, in which they agreed that the approach
taken by management was reasonable, to keep it under review until it is resolved.
there was also discussion around the number of recommendations that had been
closed. They were satisfied with the Directors’ support that those actions had been
addressed.
The type of controls as they relate to High or Medium findings continue to be
monitored. The majority of the controls where action is required are in procedures,
compliance and information security.
On the schools’ audit, there is no mechanism at the moment that is resourced to
enable the schools to feedback on their progress so these numbers were excluded
from the report. This falls under the schools’ governance- for completeness, when
these audits are finalised they will go to the Director for Educational Standards so
that their team look at the audit and the recommendations in the context of other
matters that they are working with headteachers on.
In the next financial year, internal audit will perform an exercise to find an external
assessor to carry out the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards assessment. Once
the exercise is complete, internal audit will suggest the preferred provided to
members. Internal audit implemented all but one of the recommendations- internal
audit are recommending that members reconsider implementing the recommendation
to annually complete an effectiveness assessment that includes an assessment of
the effectiveness of the internal audit service and HIA.
The Chair noted that the backlog of corporate actions is starting to decrease. When
asked about the process of recruitment of the head of Internal Audit, the officer
responded that in the interim there are plans to recruit via agency because the wider
role will need a reconsideration of responsibilities.
Action
Regarding the outstanding actions on; the transparency code, data breach, prepayment
cards and safeguarding, it was asked that more information is provided on
those, of which the officer noted.
Action
The officer responsible for the Local Government Transparency Code should be
proving a written briefing when they return from sick leave of which officers will
circulate if received before the next meeting.
Members asked for context regarding the PSIAS recommendation. The Chair asked
if the Audit Panel itself should consider the effectiveness of the internal audit service
at large, therefore it is not a self-assessment of the Panel, it is the Panel conducting
an assessment of the Council’s internal audit function. Officers responded that the
assessment focus is the skills and function of the Panel.
Action
Officers to produce this self-assessment for the Panel to review on an annual basis
for the next meeting
Supporting documents: