The Interim Capital and
Treasury Manager introduced the report and welcomed
questions.
The Chair commented that
following from the training session on 18January 2011, the essence
of this report is for the committee to decide whether the fund
should take a more passive role,
reducing the numbers of managers and making it more risk
averse.
With reference to section
6, Councillor Feakes asked whether non-core funding is used for
higher risk investment.
The Interim Capital and
Treasury Manager confirmed this to be the case. Property cannot
easily be combined with other asset classes. The interesting issue
is how to deal with the more peripheral asset classes such
as hedge funds, venture capital and
credit. Preliminary analysis suggests that an absolute term fund may be appropriate.
Councillor Feakes asked whether there will be a change of
managers on the core fund. The Interim
Capital and Treasury Manager replied that managers will be changed
if the fund moves into passive. At the
moment you have RCM, and Alliances which are active global
equity managers.
Councillor Feakes asked whether the last meeting made any
decision to this effect. The Chair stated that the final decision
will effectively be made at the next meeting when Hymans produce a
detailed report on the options and process
Councillor Feakes commented that Alliance have not managed the
fund satisfactorily, and enquired whether there were
any channels of redress to express this
view.
The Chair commented that stocks
have performed better in the last quarter. However, he noted the
concerns raised and suggested that a possible representation
through the LAPFF could be made to note the Fund Managers poor
performance.
|