Venue: Council Chamber - Civic Suite
Contact: Kevin Flaherty 0208 3149327 or Olga Cole 0208 3148577 or Salena Mulhere 0208 3143380
Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 28 KB
Minutes:
Councillor Muldoon (Healthier
Communities Select Committee and Overview & Scrutiny Business
Panel) declared a personal interest as an elected governor of the
South London and Maudesley Trust.
The Mayor and Councillor Wise
declared personal interests as out patients at Lewisham
Hospital.
Councillor Feakes declared a
personal interest as his partner was employed by the South London
and Maudesley Trust.
Councillor Jacq Paschoud
declared a personal interest as a member of a Health Trust and also
in respect of her son’s employment as a Staff Nurse in the
A&E Department of Lewisham Hospital.
|
2. |
Response to the consultation on the Trust Special Administrator's draft report PDF 66 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.
|
Response to the Consultation on
the Trust Special Administrator’s draft report
|
2.1
|
The Mayor introduced members to
the joint meeting and accepted this item as a late report. He
explained the late circulation of papers was a direct result of the
TSA timetable which was very restrictive given the complex nature
of the proposals. He said in his 36 years of public life he had
never encountered an issue which had generated such grave public
concern.
|
2.2
|
The background to, and an
overview of the TSA consultation was then given by the Chief
Executive, following which the Mayor invited members of all three
bodies present to raise questions.
|
2.3
|
Councillor Maines asked if the hospital could be locally
listed and whether it could be added to the Register of Community
Assets. He also asked for confirmation of the status of the
Kaleidoscope Centre. He went onto to point out the ‘Picture
of Health’ recommendations had never been delivered and he
asked if the community based Care Strategy could be fully
integrated with Social Services.
|
|
|
2.4
|
The Executive Director of
Community Services explained the Council was always prepared to
work with the Hospital and CCG to develop community based services
and prevent unnecessary admissions. However spreading a largely
elderly client group with a complex range of problems over 4
hospitals would prove more difficult.
|
2.5
|
The Director of
Children’s Social Care confirmed Kaleidoscope had been
transferred to the Hospital.
|
2.6
|
The Head of Law reported the
Localism Act 2011 specifically excluded local authorities from
adding buildings to the Register of Community Assets.
|
2.7
|
In terms of local listing, the
Deputy Mayor said some of the hospital buildings were already
listed but that this afforded very limited protection against
development.
|
|
|
2.8
|
Councillor Wise asked if the
Coroners Service formed part of the discussion and was informed by
the Chief Executive that it did not but that there was to be a
Londonwide review in any
event.
|
2.9
|
Councillor Hall asked if the
TSA had received proper legal advice from the Department for Health
or from the Treasury prior to embarking upon this process. The
Chief Executive said there were key legal and interpretative
questions which required examination as it seemed as if the TSA had
broadened his responsibilities beyond what was allowed by statute.
The Head of Law confirmed the Unsustainable Provider Regime
provisions were drawn very narrowly and that the guidance issued
two days before the appointment of the TSA appeared to be much more
widely drafted than allowed by the statutory framework.
|
2.10
|
Councillor Fitzsimmons asked
about risk assessments on major incidents in the context of
Lewisham lacking an A&E Department and was informed by the
Mayor none had been done.
|
|
|
2.11
|
Councillor Jacq Paschoud added that she was concerned about
any reduction in critical care and the implications for routine
surgery that might go wrong.
|
2.12
|
Councillor Feakes asked if changes to commissioning would
impact on Council services and if arrangements relied on hospitals
bidding for work ...
view the full minutes text for item 2.
|
|
3. |
Notice of special urgency decision PDF 52 KB
|