Menu
Council meetings

Agenda, decisions and minutes

Venue: Committee Room 2

Contact: Andrew Hagger (Tel: 020 8314 9446 Email:  andrew.hagger@lewisham.gov.uk) 

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes of the meeting held on 30 October 2014 pdf icon PDF 85 KB

Decision:

Resolved:

 

The Committee agreed that under point 3.23 the sentence “Training opportunities for staff should also be maximised” be added to the end of the paragraph.

 

The Committee agreed the minutes of the previous meeting, subject to the agreed amendment.

Minutes:

Resolved:

 

The Committee agreed that under point 3.23 the sentence “Training opportunities for staff should also be maximised” be added to the end of the paragraph.

 

The Committee agreed the minutes of the previous meeting, subject to the agreed amendment.

2.

Declarations of interest pdf icon PDF 26 KB

Minutes:

Cllr Liam Curran declared an interest as a member of the Baring Trust.

3.

Mayoral response to the comments of the Sustainable Development Select Committee - Preserving Public Houses and assets of community value pdf icon PDF 66 KB

Minutes:

This item was considered alongside the part 2 section of the information at Item 8.

4.

Bakerloo line consultation pdf icon PDF 61 KB

Decision:

Resolved:

 

The Committee resolved to pass the following comments to the Overview & Scrutiny Business Panel on 16 December 2014:

 

·         The Committee supports the extension of the Bakerloo Line past Lewisham to Hayes with the option to also extend to Bromley.

 

·         Whilst the Committee recognises the importance of the Bakerloo extension to Lewisham and the resulting transformation of Lewisham Station into a major strategic transport interchange, the Committee wanted to specifically ensure the submission to TfL did not overly focus on, or give the impression, implied or otherwise, that we would be in anyway satisfied with the Bakerloo Line terminating there. The Committee felt that the real benefits to the wider borough of Lewisham can only be fully realised by ensuring the route continues south into the borough and the case for extension should be made on that basis.

 

·         The Committee highlighted that the extension will pass through flood plain areas, especially around the Ladywell area, and that provisions should be considered to alleviate issues around building on flood plains.

 

·         Consideration should be given to the rezoning of stations on the new Bakerloo route, bringing more stations from charging zone 3 to zone 2 and from charging zone 4 to zone 3.

 

·         The current location of Lower Sydenham station is recognised as unsuitable for connectivity with pedestrians and other forms of public transport. Further serious investigation should be carried out with regard to relocating the station to one or both sides of the bridge at Southend Lane at the junction with the current Hayes Line/future Bakerloo extension. Furthermore, the current bridge width is acknowledged to be too narrow and too low for both vehicles and pedestrians. The inevitable significant track and bridge works would present the ideal opportunity to relocate the station, thus enabling greater integration with pedestrian, bus and car traffic. The land available could also enable development advantages to the borough.

 

·         For accuracy of the record, the report should include in its timeline the significant role of the Sustainable Development Committee since 2010 in supporting and promoting the southern extension of the Bakerloo Line.

Minutes:

Simon Moss (Transport Policy & Development Manager) introduced the item, highlighting the following key points:

·         Lewisham Council has been lobbying for the extension to the Bakerloo line for a long time.

·         This consultation by TfL is a good opportunity to put together the strongest possible response and a lot of background work is being carried out by the consultants Parsons Binckerhoff.

·         TfL has agreed to extend the deadline for submission for Lewisham Council as it is interested in seeing a full and detailed response from the Council.

·         The consultation will be discussed here, at Overview & Scrutiny Business Panel later in December and then agreed at Mayor & Cabinet in early January before being submitted.

 

Jon Noble from Parsons Binckerhoff then introduced their presentation and highlighted the following key points:

·         The Bakerloo line extension is required now. Capacity on trains running through Lewisham station is 85%, which is very busy.

·         The Bakerloo extensions will bring an increase in capacity, improved journey times to many central London locations and improved public transport accessibility levels (PTALs).

·         The development opportunities presented by the Bakerloo line will increase the number of new properties that can be built and forms a major part of the case for extending the line beyond Lewisham.

·         Lewisham Station is already a major interchange for South East London. The Bakerloo extension, with a possible Overground extension, would transform it into a strategic transport hub.

·         This would be an opportunity to reshape the station to make it more suitable for its improved role. This would include making it look better and feel easier to use.

·         The consultation response will look at the location of Old Kent Road second station, which could be very closely to the boundary of Lewisham.

·         There is also the potential for a change in the location of Lower Sydenham station or to rethink the land uses and development potential around the existing station.

·         There are a number of environmental considerations that need to be taken account of.

 

In response to questions from the Committee Simon Moss, John Miller (Head of Planning), and Jon Noble provided the following information:

·         The increase in housing units that are viable in Catford if the Bakerloo extension is included comes from the increased marketability and attractiveness of the location rather than the PTAL, which is high anyway.

·         There a finite number of units that can be built without exploring more high rise options. The numbers presented assume a mix of 1 and 2 bed flats.

·         The Council does not own the land around Lewisham station that would be needed to remodel Lewisham as a strategic interchange. However the Council is in discussion with those people who do.

·         The portal location for the tunnel is likely to be around Wearside, so the line would be above ground by the time it reaches Ladywell.

·         Step free and disabled access is part of the list of things required as part of the submission to TfL.

·         The current location of Lower Sydenham station is in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

5.

Modern Roads Review pdf icon PDF 28 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Simon Moss (Transport Policy & Development Manager) introduced the item, highlighting the following key points:

·         TfL have produced a Roads Modernisation Plan, which introduces a new approach to roads including a new typology of road. This comes in response to findings of the Roads Task Force.

·         It is not possible to take one style of cycling infrastructure apply that across the borough as there are different situations within the borough that require specific approaches and solutions.

·         TfL has two approaches to cycling infrastructure. The Cycle Superhighway is about improving cycling along major arteries, with proposals to bring two Cycle Superhighways to Lewisham. The other approach is Quietways, which uses quieter streets and/or parks to develop safer routes around the borough. There is a pilot Quietway being put into the north of the borough.

 

During questions Cllr Curran vacated the Chair, with Cllr Walsh taking over chairing responsibilities.

 

In response to questions from the Committee, Simon Moss, Liz Brooker and Tamsin Williams (Senior Air Quality Officer) provided the following information:

·         Officers are carrying out a study on how to allocate carriage space for cycles on roads. However, the costs involved mean it will take a long time to put improvements such as these in place.

·         Cycle training is important, quite often people don’t know the best routes to take to get them where they want in a quick and safe way. So route planning is a focus for training for adults. Cyclist training involves teaching them how to use the road more safely. However education for drivers about cyclists is also important so they are more aware of cyclists. In Lewisham the drivers on the door2door service have all done training so they are more aware of cyclists and techniques they use to ensure they stay safe. The aim is to encourage mutual respect between road users.

·         Lewisham hasn’t signed up to the cycle to work scheme offering bicycles at a reduced price due to tax reductions, but does offer an interest free loan to purchase a bicycle. Lewisham also offers a £10 bike loan scheme which encourages new cyclists.

·         The bulk of funding for promoting cycling comes from TfL, including most money for new infrastructure.

·         Quietways is a branded route that is well signposted with easily identifiable signs and directions. The aim in Lewisham is to align Quietways to a variety of routes. This can be done by using separate pedestrian and cycle paths, routes through parks as well as cycle lanes. The improvements needed can be built into the Local Implementation Plan and fits into the corridor approach that is being taken to improving infrastructure.

·         The speed that other vehicles travel at on roads can be a key deterrent for cyclists.

·         The aim for Lewisham is to get as many routes as possible as part of Quietways due to the strong branding that they have and the support from TfL. However there are a lot of other branded and signposted cycle routes, including London Cycling Network, Waterlink  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

6.

Select Committee work programme pdf icon PDF 153 KB

Additional documents:

Decision:

Resolved:

 

The Committee agreed the work programme.

Minutes:

Resolved:

 

The Committee agreed the work programme.

7.

Items to be referred to Mayor and Cabinet

Minutes:

There were none.